What are the biggest mistakes in a first-generation contingent workforce program?
The biggest mistakes in a first-generation contingent workforce program are launching without a clear business purpose, failing to secure executive support, overlooking change management, and waiting too long to collect stakeholder feedback. New programs also struggle when leaders do not define success measures, clarify decision rights, or make the approved process practical for hiring managers and suppliers. In a live ProcureCon Contingent Staffing session about contingent workforce missteps, one Contingent Workforce Lead at an AI security platform provider shared an example of a common implementation error. She explained that training managers on where to submit a requisition and how to use a system was not enough; in this case, the program had not sufficiently connected the change to the organization's strategy or explained why it mattered to those expected to use it. In the same discussion, speakers noted that formal stakeholder feedback should be built into the launch plan, rather than introduced after adoption problems emerge. One practitioner described waiting about 12 months to establish a structured voice-of-the-customer process, then using the feedback to identify friction and improve the experience. For procurement managers and new program owners, define the business problem the program will solve, the outcomes leaders expect, and the measures that will demonstrate progress before implementation begins. Develop a communication plan for executives, hiring managers, suppliers, and other affected teams; then gather feedback within the first 30, 60, and 90 days and visibly act on the issues that emerge. Join ProcureCon Contingent Staffing to learn from practitioners who have launched, adjusted, and strengthened contingent workforce programs through real implementation challenges.